Search for: "People v. Key (1984)" Results 1 - 20 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2007, 9:45 am
Here's the abstract: Unlike many key corporate law decisions, the 1984 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Aronson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:26 am
LEXIS 1984 (September 26, 2007): As Judge Klein notes, people in another's home may or may not have much authority, for homeowners may or may not spell out for guests or people happening to be in their home exactly what authority they have. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Inco has been ordered to pay $36 million in damages for lost property value, after 2000, due to nickel emissions before 1984 that were legal at the time: Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
II, § 16; [Strickland v.Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 685-86 (1984)]; People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Michael Lumer
But the key moments in the civil case (to explain why the City could be liable now for things that happened in the mid 1980's) first occurred in April 1984, when the FBI found 36  confidential NYPD Intelligence Division reports at the home of Rosario Gambino, a mobster then under indictment for heroin trafficking. [read post]