Search for: "People v. King (1992)"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
” It was part of a list of rights that accompanied 12 indictments against King James II, including one indictment that accused him of disarming Protestants. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
Authorized (King James) Version (1611)2. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Arbor alleged that the City had, without a vote of the people, effectively levied hidden taxes on its citizens through the excessive ch [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
” (In re Deshaun, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at 1387, quoting People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
The claimant also demonstrated that the dismissal of the indictment, at the request of the People, was based, in part, on newly-discovered medical evidence based on CPL 440.10 [1] [g]. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
Two that come to mind, for example, are Evan Thomas’s The Man To See (1992) (about Edward Bennett Williams) and Louis Nizer’s My Life In Court (1961). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Beethoven - (1992) (Dog-St. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
The incarnation of the people of England (represented as was customary for the time by its classes―king, lords temporal and spiritual, and commons) would have viewed an unconstrained common law as constraining its ability to “make” law, that is to use the power of commanding behavior instrumentally. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
When people see the red sole on the street they think Louboutin. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Anthony Graves was convicted in 1994 for killing six people in 1992. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
