Search for: "People v. Latham" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
This post takes up the questions of how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their use of other people's data, generally without prior notice or permission. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
” The defendant reviewed the records of 145 people between 17 January and 17 October 2019 “without having a business need to do so. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Donald Trump, et al. (23-CR-80101-AMC) New York (NY): The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘From a discovery standpoint, you’re sending documents and communicating with clients and other people and you’re going to have to search those emails in future,’ the person said. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Disability and Accessibility Jalayne Arias, University of California San Francisco, Alzheimer's Disease in the Workplace: A Framework for Liability Jennifer Bard, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Including People with Disabilities in Federally Conducted, Funded, and Regulated Research Elizabeth Pendo, Saint Louis University School of Law, The Costs of Uncertainty: The DOJ's Stalled Progress on Accessible Medical Equipment Under the ADA Megan Wright, Penn State Law,… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In other news, Ministers have been urged to reassess the law giving anonymity for people making allegations about sexual offences. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
Before the decision in Obergefell v. [read post]