Search for: "People v. Lewis (2001)" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
REV. 1263, 1270-71, 1288-89 (2020); Seth Kreimer, Rays Of Sunlight in a Shadow “War”: FOIA, The Abuses of Anti-Terrorism, and the Strategy of Transparency, 11 LEWIS & CLARK L. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled for Chevron. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:06 am
   Back in 2001, in Saucier v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 12:56 am
We know how contingency fees generate powerful financial incentives, see, e.g., Lewis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Lewie Decisions of Interest NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Patron's Own Actions May Have Caused InjuriesDenying Cross-Motion on Issue of Liability Meade v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
However, the case cited by defendant does not represent a change in the decisional law as it was decided prior to the appellate decision in this case and relied upon other decisions of both the Appellate Division and the Appellate Term of the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts standing for the same proposition (see, People v Lewis, 16 3d 173 [1 Dept. 2005]; Patil v Country-Wide Ins. [read post]