Search for: "People v. Lord (1994)"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
In Rahman Lord Bingham and Lord Roger agreed with the decision in Gamble and held that D2 was not liable: it was as if two new people had jumped out of the bushes and murdered the victim. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In R v Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 AC 212 sadomasochists were held to have been rightly convicted of causing injury to others who willingly consented to the injuries that they received. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
Fewer people know that in 1994, Philips applied to register a 3D mark for the shape of its three headed razor (though Ilanah's mum claims to know this too). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
The appeal was heard, and unanimously dismissed, by a panel of five Supreme Court justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm
Injuries can be psychiatric as well as physical, but the prosecution will need to provide medical evidence of this (R v Fook, 1994). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm
Porter Magill v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
What about people, such as Ace Books, who had relied on the Lord of the Rings’ public domain status in the interim, before it was restored? [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
In Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets [2003] 2 AC 430, Lords Bingham and Millett had made pretty scathing comments on the lawfulness of contracting out the review function – Lord Bingham (at [10]) had “very considerable doubts” whether it was a function; and Lord Millett agreeing pointed out that the SI was “concerned in very general terms with deregulation and the subcontracting of ordinary local authority… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
As Lord Justice Goldring said: "12. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
Abolishing the House of Lords? [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It was by Lord Donaldson in 1981: “No particular form of award is required. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44 of the… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Rev. 197, 208 (1994). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Lord v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The leading authority for many years has been Hunt v- Severs (1994). [read post]
