Lustgarten had misrepresented the applicable standard of care and accused one of the malpractice defendants of having intentionally falsified medical records without a good faith basis.[2] A reviewing trial court reversed the finding of misrepresentation of the standard of care, but agreed that Lustgarden had wrongly asserted the defendant’s fabrication of records, and modified the revocation to a one year suspension.[3] On appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the court held… [read post]