Search for: "People v. Main (1984)" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 6:26 am by Jeff Welty
People who didn’t like the outcome of Vinson hoped that it would be reversed by the Supreme Court in Voisine v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:26 am by Jeff Welty
People who didn’t like the outcome of Vinson hoped that it would be reversed by the Supreme Court in Voisine v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm by administrator
Available at http://www.nacdl.org/CHAMPION/ARTICLES/98mar04.htm quoting from the book MAIN JUSTICE by Jim McGee and Brian Duffy. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
There are two main reasons for recusal: personal (or familial) stake in a case, or previous experience with a case. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Kelly Goles
The novel is structured around the mythical and endless case, Jarndyce v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
”[12]Article 100 became Article 53 in the current 1984 version of the Constitution, and the language of the article remained mostly unchanged. [13] Article 53 deals with the duties of the citizens, it does not explicitly provide means for the state to exercise judicial authority. [read post]