Search for: "People v. Manis (1992)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Regulation 10(3B) specifies many categories of persons who are not “persons from abroad”. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
So much of how I think about the Supreme Court and the Constitution has been influenced by Sandy’s work, as well as the work of so many of the other people participating in this event. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
Many years ago, in a junior high school English exam, this Kat wrote a phrase she had encountered several times in English magazines and American movies, etc.: ‘Long time no see’. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 3:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Paul (1992) makes clear that it would be unconstitutional for the law to be so limited. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Many things are happening copyright-wise under the Brussels sky. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
To Justice Thomas, the intentions of people who in good faith wanted more racial diversity on campuses in 2013 are no different from the intentions of people who wanted all-white campuses in 1954. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
The majority of four (Bell, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ) answered as follows: The majority considers that Aboriginal Australians (understood according to the tripartite test in Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 at 70) are not within the reach of the “aliens” power conferred by s 51(xix) of the Constitution. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:00 am by ernst
[Here is the citation for the Honorary Fellowship of the American Society for Legal History for Víctor Tau Anzoátegui. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  Interestingly, the last time NBC/WSJ asked the question, back in May of 1992, the split was 28/54, with almost twice as many people saying the Court was too conservative as opposed to too liberal. [read post]