Search for: "People v. Martin (1982)" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2012, 4:23 am
  MARTIN: But this isn't the first time that the name has been used to sell a product not produced by Navajo people. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
It is due to people like this that Banks are in trouble, we pay more to use our credit cards, and it is hard to trust people. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
App. 4th 1165, 1180 (2000). [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts § 578 cmt. e; see also Martin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Martin, 690 F.2d 1078, 1082 (4th Cir. 1982)(citations omitted) Of course, not long after the District of Columbia Circuit decided Ferebee, in 1993, the Supreme Court decided Daubert, followed by decisions in Joiner, Kumho Tire, and Weisgram. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Supp. 863, 867 (D.N.J. 1982), aff'd without opinion, 729 F.2d 1445 (3rd Cir. 1984). [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
That same day, I met Martine Roy for the first time. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]