Search for: "People v. Martin (1982)" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Tex. 1982) (“From the relative risk, we can calculate the probability that a given case of GBS was caused by vaccination. . . . [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
  The people charged with protecting us are failing! [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 4:23 am
  MARTIN: But this isn't the first time that the name has been used to sell a product not produced by Navajo people. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Ostendorf -- Error to fail to consider whether lesser sanction would be a viable alternativeJANUARY MARTIN, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 764 N.E.2d 35, 42 (Ill. 2002) (applied to medical device); Martin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Martin, 690 F.2d 1078, 1082 (4th Cir. 1982)(citations omitted) Of course, not long after the District of Columbia Circuit decided Ferebee, in 1993, the Supreme Court decided Daubert, followed by decisions in Joiner, Kumho Tire, and Weisgram. [read post]