Search for: "People v. Martin (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Lombardi, the en banc court held that the district court erred by dismissing the inmate’s Section 1983 method-of-execution claim sua sponte and without holding a hearing. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 1983)). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  1983 applied to register Have a Break as separate TM, though used with Kit-Kat name always. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 764 N.E.2d 35, 42 (Ill. 2002) (applied to medical device); Martin v. [read post]
(The law and ruling are explained in detail here.)In the Indiana case, the Court cited a precedent from 1983, Akron v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Martin, No. 06-1983 A downward departure sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base is affirmed over the government's challenge to the sentence's reasonableness where the sentencing court properly exercised its discretion and it reached a defensible result, even though the defendant availed from a substantial downward deviation from his guideline sentencing range. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
§ 1983, alleging that her treatment by the county violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to accommodate her gender dysphoria. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
The government points to a long history of restricting gun ownership by people who pose a threat to others. [read post]