Search for: "People v. Mathes" Results 21 - 40 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
He received a B.S. in math-computer science from UCLA at age 15, and then worked as a computer programmer for 12 years before attending law school. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:48 am by SHG
This was applied by Justice Mark Dwyer in People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
  (It generally amounts to more than 50% of the total settlement recovery, acknowledging, at least by basic math, that they are the primary beneficiary of the litigation.). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision in Polanski v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Part I tells the story of Colegrove v. [read post]
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:53 am by Eric Goldman
Some math: if Allied paid $10 for each click–an extremely high CPC–the total economic value of the ads at issue is about $1k. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Kant may have believed that a system could be designed that would force even devils, as “rational actors,” to serve the public good, but few people agree. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:47 am by Eric Segall
This factor leads us to the very lengthy footnote 48 in Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s not about balancing incommensurable property v. speech, but speech v. speech which is more feasible. [read post]