Search for: "People v. McGinnis"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm
In a recent post at the Originalism Blog, he skewers the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
In ASARCO v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
In Tobe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
Even the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:15 am
McGinnis. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
US), to apply extraterritorially (Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:18 pm
"From "How the Federalist Society Won/The conservative legal movement was pivotal in getting Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallLast week at the Law & Liberty blog, Professor John McGinnis, a self-proclaimed originalist, was quite giddy about the Court's Second Amendment opinion in New York Pistol & Rifle Association v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am
In previous writings, McGinnis has suggested that those defects have been cured by the Reconstruction Amendments but, of course, women and people of color were excluded from that process as well. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
" Originalism should play such a role, according to McGinnis, because, among other things, Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
By Eric SegallLast week on the Law & Liberty Blog, Professor John McGinnis, a self-identified textualist-originalist, wrote a love letter to the Supreme Court about its decision in NFIB v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
As McGinnis says, this decision came as no surprise because the Roberts Court previously held in Seila Law v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” At Law & Liberty (via How Appealing), John McGinnis maintains that “Gorsuch’s decision defends an acontextual literalism that has the potential to sever more generally the connection between the legal interpretation of a text and the people who made and understood it. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
McGinnis, 352 F.3d 582 (2d Cir. 2003). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
McGinnis is George C. [read post]
