Search for: "People v. Miranda" Results 141 - 160 of 904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 6:04 pm
  Your Miranda rights come from the Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:22 am by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Smith(2/16/12]) the Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for driving while impaired upon a holding that the trial court erred in permitting the People to introduce evidence that Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:40 pm by Rick Pildes
Put another way, this is an effort by the Obama administration to show it does not need to put people into a regime of long-term military detention in order to ensure that alleged terrorists are adequately mined for whatever intelligence value they might have. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:31 pm by Tamara Marie Carson
  Since 2016 marks the 50th anniversary of the landmark decision Miranda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:19 am by SHG
Ironically, people would have to speak in order to claim their right to remain silent.This position appears more hostile to Miranda than any taken in the Supreme Court by previous Democratic Administrations. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:42 pm by Lynda Barack
  It is those people who have been most impacted by the protections of the Miranda decision and who will suffer most from its erosion. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
 Here, immediately after telling the suspect his Miranda rights, the officer asked the suspect:  "Having in mind these rights that I just read, the detective would like to know if he can speak with you right now? [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
  Because I wouldn't feel free -- most reasonable people wouldn't feel free -- to leave with a lot less. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm by Orin Kerr
Most people don't realize Miranda remedies are so narrow, and I'm not sure Patane is persuasive. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 10:52 am by Shaun Kaufman
I know this well because I argued this point before the Colorado Supreme Court in 1997 in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
So I hope it comes as no surprise to anyone that the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms the conviction and death sentence.And if doing so requires the court to hold (as it does here) that the public safety exception to Miranda applies and allows the police to continue to question a suspect -- and use the resulting testimony against him at trial -- even after he's invoked his right to counsel, so be it. [read post]