Search for: "People v. Mitchell (2001)" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Administrator
Shakur”) was employed by the Defendant (“Mitchell Plastics”) as a machine operator from September 24, 2001 to August 27, 2007 when he was dismissed by the defendant. . . . [7] Although there was no evidence that the banter engaged in by Messrs. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Mr Mitchell was severely injured and died on 10 August 2001. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:28 am by Amy Howe
Mitchell was tried in federal court in 2003 before a jury made up of 11 white people and one Native American. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
—David Mitchel, Norton Mitchel Marketing The matchup for Super Bowl XLVI has now been set. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the [54 A.D.3d 885] defendant's statements were voluntarily made, despite the fact that he was experiencing pain from an injured wrist (see People v Hughes, 280 AD2d 694, 695 [2001]; People v Ragin, 224 AD2d 642 [1996]). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That's unfathomable, really.Appleseed's recommendations will ring familiar to Grits readers:(1) End jail bookings for Class C misdemeanors.(2) End most jail bookings for offenses eligible for citation.(3) Quickly release most people after jail booking on personal bond.(4) Implement diversion programs.(5) Analyze local data to develop local solutions to reduce jail use.Grits is delighted to see so much additional data produced about Class C misdemeanor arrests just before the… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
Case Study: Beckman v Match.com The case in question–and the reason I wanted to write about this–involves Mary Kay Beckman, a 46-year-old Match.com user who was paired with suitor Wade Mitchell Ridley, 50, through the site. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
ATP Health & Beauty Care, Inc., 2008 WL 3845294 (D.Conn 2008); Mitchell v. [read post]