Search for: "People v. Motley"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
The clue here is in para 189 where Arnold J warns helpfully thatFurthermore, although I cannot prejudge later arguments in this case, it is not inevitable that future applicants will recover all their costs even if successful: compare the practice in respect of Norwich Pharmacal orders, as to which see Totalise plc v Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Indeed, I had sort of thought the discussion over, first, with 9/11 and Kofi Annan's recognition that his true love was not "global civil society" - so, so 2000, so Millennium Global Civil Society Summit - nor even the motley crew that inhabits the General Assembly, playpen of the nations, but once and forever the Security Council. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
(Attia et al v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
“The people that I take the most objection to are the people who say, ‘I did it by myself,’” Sotomayor told the audience. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
 Versus, for example, a series of robust bilateral or multilateral deals among key players that simply ignored the UN and the motley of the General Assembly specifically. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
In doing so, he actually hurt people. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
