Search for: "People v. Myers (1983)" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
” Previously, the court had held in 1983 in Connick v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 154 (1983) (government employee’s “limited First Amendment interest” was trumped by action which might “disrupt the office, undermine [supervisor’s] authority, and destroy close working relationships”); Snepp v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Of the 134 cases, 52 ill people have been hospitalized and no deaths have been reported. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The Statute Restricts Conduct Only When It Is Accompanied by Speech That Conveys a Certain Message Utah bigamy law does not ban married people from having sex with people other than their spouses.[2] It does not ban married people from living with extramarital romantic partners. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Bristol-Myers Squibb, 97 F. [read post]