Search for: "People v. Myers (1993)" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” from a post by Kelly Laycock.The logic and style of the arguments about patent examiners is indeed incomprehensible.Perhaps "patenthawk" should include law review articles, in addition to court decisions, within his scope; from a recent post on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
And after his death in 1993, she guarded his legacy and continued to attend oral arguments in important civil rights cases. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
 One swarm may last for months up to well over a year, depending on the popularity of the work, and people may leave and re-enter the same swarm at any time. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
Myers-Dickson Furniture Co., 479 F.2d 740,748 (5th Cir. 1993) (TILA). [read post]