Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 41 - 60
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
The Court of Appeals noted that `[w]hen reviewing a district court's decision on a motion to suppress, we review its findings of fact for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:06 pm
Now the Sixth Circuit has joined the action in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Smallfoot v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
Thus, the issue before the Court is a question of law reviewed de novo. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 pm
Oscar Private Equity Investments v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
” This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 10:39 am
Par Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
"When reviewing a motion to reconsider that was based only on the trial court's application (or purported misapplication) of existing law, as opposed to a motion to reconsider that is based on new facts or legal theories not presented in the prior proceedings, our standard of review is de novo … 'Where a party's motion for reconsideration merely asks the trial court to reexamine its earlier application of existing law,'… [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:39 pm
Furnes v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am
In the case Gevo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm
Schmidt, 712 N.W.2d 530, 535 (Minn. 2006) (discussing the conflicts-of-law approaches used by other states in deciding evidentiary issues); People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
” Ahmed v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:39 am
Simcox v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
In, Panteleris v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
” Jenkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
