Search for: "People v. Oliver" Results 41 - 60 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm by J
HHJ Oliver-Jones QC (sitting as a deputy High Court Judge) granted an order on a quia timet basis. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
In order to be defamatory, a statement must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and carry a meaning that adversely affects the attitude of other people towards the subject. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Separate reasons in Oliver Douglas v McLernon [No 3] were published by His Honour in respect of a “no case to answer” submission made by Toni Fitzgerald in one of the proceedings. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm by Brad Kuhn
 This question was recently answered by the Court of Appeal in Olive Lane Industrial Park v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:57 am by Terry Hart
” Kast-ing A Wide Net: Statutory Damages Under The Copyright Act — Scott Alan Burroughs discusses a recent 9th Circuit decision in Erickson Productions v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
We had a post from Oliver Cox on the judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Greenwood); in one’s “open field” in the area beyond the curtilage around one’s home, even if the field is surrounded by fencing and no-trespass signs (Oliver v. [read post]