Search for: "People v. Payne" Results 121 - 140 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
Helmerich and Payne In 2009, Helmerich and Payne, Inc., paid a penalty and disgorgement fee of $1.3 million for payments which were made to secure customs clearances in Argentina and Venezuela. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Payne, 295 Ga. 609, 614, 761 S.E.2d 289, 294 (2014). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:43 am by Leslie Francis
This court reasoned that he had not brought evidence of the severity or length of his disease, or evidence that his employer regarded him as disabled, Payne v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Applying the law as it existed after Rivera's conviction became final in July 2004, we find that although evidence of “significantly heightened recklessness,” People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3135-3144.[4] Asay GRB, Roy K, Lang JE, Payne RL, Howard DH. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3135-3144.[4] Asay GRB, Roy K, Lang JE, Payne RL, Howard DH. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
   This case has probably had the greatest impact on internet freedom of expression (and therefore arguably all freedom of expression) given Google’s pre-eminence as our means of obtaining information on people. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:57 am
  This changed with the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]