Search for: "People v. Peters"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
News can travel fast and to many people at once. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:43 am
(V. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm
Congratulations to Peter D. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
On reply, Willard argued that “the law in New York plainly favors a buy-out as opposed to the liquidation of an on-going company – certainly one like Matrix that employs several dozen or hundreds of people at any given time. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
However, the Chinese Supreme People’s Court has confirmed that the Chinese courts have jurisdiction to hear the case, even in the absence of agreement between the parties as to the forum in which terms are to be determined and without any patent infringement claim. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Peter Pan: removing Tiger Song (?). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
” Hilton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
From People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
Weibust, Peter A. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am
” People v National Rifle Association, Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In addition, we will continue to follow the trial and appeal, respectively, in the complex contempt of Congress cases involving former White House advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
