Search for: "People v. Phillips"
Results 181 - 200
of 909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:53 am
The People & c., Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:01 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am
Jack Phillips and his wife own a business in Colorado, where as a cake artist Phillips designs cakes. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Phillips is happy to sell his products to gay people. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Phillips; Dankos v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
Thornton claims her book is based on hour-long interviews with more than 250 people. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 8:51 am
Covid has killed more than a million people. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
Phillips’ religious beliefs. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
”); Ellamae Phillips Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
PHILLIPS and GALE PHILLIPS, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:46 pm
From Young v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
Defendants' motion to exclude Phillips is 62 pages long. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which rested on "religious hostility on the part of the State itself," and specifically on "the Commission's consideration of Phillips' case," which the Court held "was neither tolerant nor respectful of Phillips' religious beliefs. [read post]
