Search for: "People v. Purcell"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
IPSO IPSO has issued a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 03743-18 Purcell v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03195-18 Purcell v Hackney Gazette, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03194-18 Purcell v The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03180-18 Purcell v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
Professor Karlan focuses on Crawford v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
(relisted after the October 14 conference) Summarily Decided Relists Purcell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:27 pm
Hasen has many criticisms of the per curiam opinion — including its assessment of the evidence challenging the law, and its reading of a Supreme Court case called Purcell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Purcell, Jr. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Part of increase is due to fact that response time is better, so it encourages people to file. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Surely it can’t be the rule that the Court cannot fix a Purcell error because doing so violates Purcell; if so, then lower courts could ignore Purcell with impunity.But we want to set aside Purcell, and its emphasis on remedial latitude, to examine a much more fundamental question: was there, to use the language we do above, “a strong and imminent likelihood of a federal violation (constitutional or statutory)” for the district judge in Wisconsin… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
Purcell Painting and Coatings Southwest, Inc., E.D. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:32 pm
” People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Purcell Professor Robert C. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
” The petitioners in each of the five relisted cases – Purcell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Sept. 2); Purcell v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]