Search for: "People v. Purcell" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has issued a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 03743-18 Purcell v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03195-18 Purcell v Hackney Gazette, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03194-18 Purcell v The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03180-18 Purcell v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 14 conference)   Summarily Decided Relists Purcell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:27 pm
Hasen has many criticisms of the per curiam opinion — including its assessment of the evidence challenging the law, and its reading of a Supreme Court case called Purcell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by Michael Froomkin
Part of increase is due to fact that response time is better, so it encourages people to file. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Surely it can’t be the rule that the Court cannot fix a Purcell error because doing so violates Purcell; if so, then lower courts could ignore Purcell with impunity.But we want to set aside Purcell, and its emphasis on remedial latitude, to examine a much more fundamental question: was there, to use the language we do above, “a strong and imminent likelihood of a federal violation (constitutional or statutory)” for the district judge in Wisconsin… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
” The petitioners in each of the five relisted cases – Purcell v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:28 am
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]