Search for: "People v. Purcell" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
("The people do not vote for the 'Officers of the United States.'"); United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
” Santos and Adler referred to that principle as the “Purcell principle” referring to the case Purcell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Surely it can’t be the rule that the Court cannot fix a Purcell error because doing so violates Purcell; if so, then lower courts could ignore Purcell with impunity.But we want to set aside Purcell, and its emphasis on remedial latitude, to examine a much more fundamental question: was there, to use the language we do above, “a strong and imminent likelihood of a federal violation (constitutional or statutory)” for the district judge in Wisconsin… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has issued a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 03743-18 Purcell v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03195-18 Purcell v Hackney Gazette, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03194-18 Purcell v The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03180-18 Purcell v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
“You’re basically saying we shouldn’t look at it,” he told Purcell. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 14 conference)   Summarily Decided Relists Purcell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
” The petitioners in each of the five relisted cases – Purcell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:27 pm
Hasen has many criticisms of the per curiam opinion — including its assessment of the evidence challenging the law, and its reading of a Supreme Court case called Purcell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Joe Markowitz
In a settlement agreement entered in Purcell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]