Search for: "People v. Read (1983)"
Results 21 - 40
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Seal v United Kingdom (Application no. 50330/07) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected the claim of a man detained by the police for 9 days under mental health law. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
Continue reading [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:31 am
Griffin, 705 F.2d 434, 437 (11th Cir. 1983) (emphasis added). [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Chambers (1983). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
For example, in Stern v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 (1983), what evidentiary objections to raise, see Henry v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
§ 1983. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), in which the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
Code § 1983 for violating the 1st Amendmentand/or 4th Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
In chapters on how juries and judges decide Section 1983 disputes, Schwartz shows that relatively few cases (under 7%) go to trial, adding that “federal juries. . .disproportionately exclude people of color, poor people, people with criminal records, and people who have had negative experiences with the police. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am
Bartlett offers a different read on Hartman. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
Code §1983 and Michigan law. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 3:02 am
(By the way, if you didn't read all of Kelo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Rev. 800 (1983) (READ PARTS II and III) 1. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
First, the Court of Appeals says for the first time that people working for the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals may be sued under Section 1983 as state actors. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
Q: Where do I get a copy of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
