Search for: "People v. Richards"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:19 am
Some excerpts from Sandmann v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Dedicated to Retired Judge Dick Posner Two of America's most prominent conservative constitutional law professors, both self-described originalists, Will Baude and Michael Paulsen, have penned a 126-page opus explaining why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies on its own terms with no enabling legislation Donald Trump and likely many others from holding office under the United States or any state. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1972); Doe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
These foundational issues have kept black robed people busy for centuries and will continue to do so. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
"Writes Richard Hasen in "U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 pm
v=YZcyMgdWmPg. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
In Meyer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
Brooks, 945 F.2d 1322, 1324 n.2 (5th Cir. 1991); Richards v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
Blue v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
That law was struck down by the Ninth Circuit, but ultimately upheld, in Westside Community Schools v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Right, I am back from a two week holiday (it was lovely thank you) so onwards… Crescent Trustees Limited v Behjat. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Doe precedents or Doe v. [read post]
