Search for: "People v. Robinson (1997)" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
This proportion was significantly higher than results from a survey of healthy people, in which 24% reported eating frozen berries in the week before they were interviewed. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am by Greg Reed
Since 2003, there has been a 44% increase in disability claims filed by people previously in the workplace. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Marcus Robinson, North Carolina Supreme Court Case No. 411A94-6; see also Race and the Jury: Illegal Discrimination in Jury Selection, Equal Justice Initiative, 2021 Report. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]