Search for: "People v. Scott" Results 181 - 200 of 2,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Purdy defends the Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:18 pm
The case on which the Comment focuses is People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:25 am
That story was about Scott Pinholster, who today awaits execution, because of the judicial activism of Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
In a radio interview, Evangelical Michael Huckabee argued that the Kentucky civil clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple was as justified in defying an unjust court decision as people are justified in disregarding Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:36 pm
The case is Curators of the University of Missouri v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
This post originally appeared on the Himsworth Scott website and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Not good [Sam Bieler via Scott Greenfield, Jacob Sullum] Judge rules that New Jersey may not automatically suspend driving privileges over unpaid child support without a hearing to establish willfulness, lest it violate due process and fundamental fairness [New Jersey Law Journal; Kavadas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:54 am by Bill Amadeo
The Denson decision is a landmark case and the victory led by Scott Grabel and Associates was not just a success story for him but could also blaze a trail for criminal defense attorneys in the foreseeable future (Michigan Supreme Court, Docket No. 152916, “People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Over at Defending People, blogger and criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett has been carrying on a discussion with his readers about legal ethics. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm by David Bernstein
Vinson’s opinion hasn’t provoked Common Cause to demonstrate/riot in front of a hotel, much less a war.So Vinson’s opinion is almost exactly like Scott v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:14 pm
  But his meaning was clear enough: he meant he would not appoint the kind of judges who voted in the majority in Roe v. [read post]