Search for: "People v. Scott (1996)"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341, 360 (6th Cir. 1996) (likewise). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996)); Scott v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
See, e.g., Scott v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
Starting in July 1996, Stanley Scott lived in Greensboro Properties’ low-income housing development apartment complex. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Subsequently, in Scott v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
It goes back to the 1980s, but began in earnest in 1996. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm
That’s what the LaFave & Scott 1986 treatise reports, and I have no reason to doubt it. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
Such a question might seem obvious to most lay people, but it's particularly important in this case. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:53 am
Ravens v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
Lincoln repudiates the Dred Scott decision in his first inaugural address in 1861 and says, no nine people can make law in this country. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Scott Peppet. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
"Right now, we're not getting the net effect across all teens that we're hoping for," says Scott V. [read post]
