Search for: "People v. Sellers (1988)" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 2:31 am
The Katpoll on Case C-128/11 UsedSoft v Oracle is now closed (background here). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Linn, that the First Amendment precludes publishers (as opposed to, say, product sellers) from being held liable for alleged informational defects in the material they publish. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am by Russell Knight
When two people are married and buy real estate, there are incredible incentives to hold the property jointly. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There are all sorts of info problems, including overproduction, reciprocity problems (seller worried about giving poor rating out of fear of getting poor rating), asymmetry, information that is out of date (right to be forgotten), etc. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by Schachtman
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988). [9]  See Memorandum of Law in support of Defendant General Electric Company’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, in DeVries v. [read post]