Search for: "People v. Sharp (1983)"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
Sharpe, 96 A.D.2d 727, 465 N.Y.S.2d 352 (Fourth Dept.1983), app. den. 60 N.Y.2d 556, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 455 N.E.2d 1265 (1983). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983); Watts v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Assn. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir.1983) (involving threats mailed to the President). [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
The killing in the highlands was most intense in the years from 1980 to 1983. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
It was ruled in People v Brannon that in order to forcibly stop and detain a person, a police officer must have "reasonable suspicion that such person has committed, is committing or is about to commit a crime. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The Policy, further, states that the focus is on “both people for science and science for people”. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) From ACLU v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
As I’ve researched this question, I’ve realized more and more that one of the keys to understanding the history is understanding how people in the 18th and 19th centuries conceived “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:27 pm
In the lower courts, in addition to numerous noncapital decisions of note this week, there is one capital decision, Jason Michael Sharp v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
The case, Dillon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
People v. [read post]
