Search for: "People v. Sharpe" Results 141 - 160 of 1,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
Sharpe-- holding that race discrimination violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment (an amendment ratified in 1791, when slavery was prevalent). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
A police action in the premises of a local newspaper journal had resulted in sharp criticism on social media and websites. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:40 am
As you know, people assume newspapers have been fact checked and Ed and Rip-off Report just wanted a simple statement that Sharp's statement was unverified or, in the alternative, proof that Sharp was actually responsible for the statements in question. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
They look a little different, but the Dutch Supreme Courtsays that they should be treated just the same  Yesterday afternoon, the AmeriKat's Dutch friend, Professor Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek) sent her, hot of the press, a copy of the Dutch Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Teva delivered yesterday morning. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
Student V goes to the office again as Student B is now threatening to kill him daily and throwing sharp objects at him. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
While he holds some opinions, most notably on welfare, similar to opinions held on the political left, he is a sharp critic of ROE V. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
Thankfully Santana was not harassed for wielding his cell phone, but many people have been: officers have ordered people to stop recording, seized their devices, deleted the photos or video/audio recordings, and even arrested people. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 26 June 2019 Dame Victoria Sharp was sworn in as the new President of the Queen’s Bench Division, replacing Sir Brian Leveson who retired on 23 June 2019. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 am by Legal Beagle
Statement from the Scottish Legal Aid Board (pdf) Re: Bank charges - Sharp v Bank of Scotland A spokesperson for the Board stated, “We’re surprised and disappointed that Govan Law Centre (GLC) has publicised this case in its press release, in view of the fact that the Board only received their latest letter yesterday, which raised fresh issues and asked us to consider additional information not previously given to us. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Second, the rule assures concrete, sharp presentation of the issues and enables courts to avoid ruling on abstract grievances. [read post]