Search for: "People v. Shells"
Results 101 - 120
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
That testimony -- plus the spent shell casings -- makes it seem pretty darn obvious that there was indeed a shooting.Justice Stewart is right when she says that the evidence wasn't entirely clear about whether there were six or seven shots fired, which in turn reflects whether the gun was a revolver (which only holds six rounds) or a semiautomatic (which expels casings like the ones recovered at the scene). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:27 pm
Nash and Vann v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
Royal Dutch Shell Plc (‘RDS’) is the parent company of the Shell group of companies, incorporated in the UK. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am
Eduardo Álvarez-Armas is Lecturer in Law at Brunel University London and Affiliated Researcher at the Université Catholique de Louvain. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:01 am
Being away from people has made me appreciate people more. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Mohammad v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:19 pm
In Weller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
[Police Officer] Weber had originally testified that she believed the ammunition retrieved from Chen’s shotgun was birdshot, even though the prosecutor personally believed it was buckshot based on personal experience and the information printed on the shells. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:03 pm
That means a patent office that will enforce Supreme Court rulings like Alice v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:56 pm
” That June, the court struck down the Texas law 5-4 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:44 pm
" And this reminds me of the famous tomato-is-a-vegetable-not-a-fruit case, Nix v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:03 pm
Council, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
