Search for: "People v. Slough"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
(Justice Slough says "[T]hat’s just a detail, not a material change to her testimony. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In People ex rel Becerra v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Clift v Slough Borough Council [2009] EWHC 1550 considers the extent to which a local authority has an interest or duty to pass on allegations about anti-social behaviour to its employees and contractors for the purposes of the defence of qualified to a claim for defamation. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63 Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:46 am
Schriro v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:16 am
Putin sloughed off the "killer" accusation as macho Hollywood talk of the sort people in America go in for. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
Following the Court of Appeal decision in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 a public authority will not be allowed to rely on a defence of qualified privilege if such reliance is incompatible with the claimant’s right to respect for his private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm
In Broussard v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
” Part 1 and Part 2 – Paul Bernal Is following people illegal? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DeBord v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
How many people in your home have a smartphone? [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Congress cannot avoid this responsibility by sloughing off authority to the executive.Again, McGinnis cites no text or history for these ideas. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am
The case of Reckis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
Josh Blackman, who has been on the Supreme Court’s abortion protest buffer zone speech restriction case, McCullen v. [read post]
