Search for: "People v. Smith (1980)" Results 21 - 40 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm by Ilya Somin
They argue that this divide is exemplified by the the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Smith, 714 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by admin
  Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), and even the Court’s summary reversal of the Eleventh Circuit on ineffective assistance grounds from earlier this Term, Porter v. [read post]