Search for: "People v. Smith (1986)" Results 21 - 40 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by INFORRM
The impugned statements fell squarely within the type of material identified in Myerson v Smith’s Weekly Publishing Co. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(State legislatures, of course, can provide people with more protection than the Constitution requires.) [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (1990), which holds that laws neutral with respect to religion may be enforced despite their effects on religious exercise, there is no problem with application of a law that leaves people free to put their own religious beliefs into practice. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
Smith (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Smith (1990), here. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Co., 237 S.C. 133, 139-40, 115 S.E.2d 793, 796 (1960); Stanley Smith & Sons v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), and even the Court’s summary reversal of the Eleventh Circuit on ineffective assistance grounds from earlier this Term, Porter v. [read post]