Search for: "People v. Smith (1993)"
Results 101 - 120
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
The readers are left to their imagination about how the people who developed Bendectin felt about the litigation strategies and tactics of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
" In Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
In 1993, Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to ensure that general laws, like the one at issue in Smith, do not restrict the practice of religion. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
Wainwright and Panetti v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Corp. (84 NY2d 488,492 [1994]) Matter of Russo v Nassau County Community Coll., 81 NY2d 690, 697 [1993]). [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
A broad coalition—including a vast range of religious groups (liberal and conservative) as well as the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, People for the American Way, and the American Humanist Association—urged Congress to adopt the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
App. 1993) ("the product in dispute is a technically complex medical device"; although it broke, "res ipsa loquitur is not a substitute for proof of defect"); see King v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
S. 520, 546 (1993) (internal quota-tion marks omitted). [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Smith, Jedediah D. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm
Bray v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Rev. 163 (1993); Wisconsin v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
In 1997, in Boerne v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
§ 78m(b)(5) of the Exchange Act of 1934); Smith v. [read post]
