Search for: "People v. Smith (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 5:16 pm
In People v LaFontaine (92 NY2d 470 [1998]) the Court of Appeals held that the Appellate Divisions cannot affirm a lower court's decision for reasons which were rejected by that lower court. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:18 am
Those were the facts in Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:20 am
In Smith v Kit Kat Group (Pty) Ltd. (2017) 38 ILJ 483 (LC), the employee attempted suicide which resulted in him being severely injured and disfigured. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
Dale Carpenter’s new book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am
REP. 105-551(11) at 21 (1998). [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
Smith, 860 S.E.2d 51 (2021) (unpublished) (citing this framework from Hobbs). [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Smith, 2 Wn.2d 118, 98 P.2d 647 (1939) (individual charged with larceny could not be convicted of embezzlement). [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
S. 214, 227–228 (1998) (quoting Texas & Pacific R. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co. v Rigo, 256 AD2d 769, 770 [1998]; Home Mut. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
As for the application for a declaration, this had already been made in Smith v Scott and therefore there was nothing of additional practical use which granting a declaration would serve. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
This was not a case of Smith being inexperienced, as he has been a border officer since 1998. [read post]
