Search for: "People v. Sosa"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm
”) and for mentally disabled persons and gays (Texas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
Id. at 842, quoting Sosa v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
This is evident in, for example, his discussion of the Court’s prior decision on the ATS, Sosa v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
In 2004, in Sosa v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Peña-Irala, and the Supreme Court’s 2004 opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm
For over fifty years, Shell has extracted oil from Nigeria, causing great harm to the environment and people of the Niger delta. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:52 am
In 2004, in Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, the Supreme Court affirmed that the ATS still provides jurisdiction for international tort claims, but it cautioned federal courts not to recognize claims “for violations of any international law norm with less definite content and acceptance among civilized nations than the historical paradigms” familiar when the law was enacted. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
Drummond Co., 552 F.3d 1303, 1315 (11th Cir. 2008); Herero People's Reparations Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
The Supreme Court suggested a similar standard for ATS causes of action in Sosa v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:46 pm
The Supreme Court suggested a similar standard for ATS causes of action in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Matar v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
V. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:49 pm
The question of corporate liability under the ATS was left unsettled by the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
” Repeatedly invoking the Supreme Court’s call for caution in Sosa, the Court emphasizes that the ATS is “no license for judicial innovation” and that “judicial restraint is demanded. [read post]
