Search for: "People v. Stauffer"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
Stauffer properly pleaded his standing, and it was error for the district court to dismiss his complaint.Reversed (and remanded to address the merits of the case, including Brooks Brothers's motion to dismiss on the grounds that Stauffer didn't properly plead the required intent to deceive).Stauffer v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice
Government Cannot Intervene in False Patent Mark Qui Tam Suit Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Stauffer v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:
People, respondent v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Stauffer v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Super. 1993) (the statute begins to run when the injured party possesses sufficient critical facts to put him on notice that a wrong has been committed and that he need investigate to determine whether he is entitled to redress); Stauffer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Bunn-O-Matic stayed until the Federal Circuit issues its opinion in Stauffer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
Stauffer: proposed EU directive: product placement would have to be generically disclosed with a black dot on the screen. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
