Search for: "People v. Steiner" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2009, 8:47 am
Meyer and Dominic Roser: Enough for the Future Part II : Specific Issues 9: Rahul Kumar: Wronging Future People 10: Dieter Birnbacher: What Motivates Us to Care for the (Distant) Future? [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
People were much more likely to receive a death sentence if the victim was white -- or if the crime was in a rural county.Another sociologist offers a more theoretical look: Benjamin Fleury-Steiner, "Death in 'Whiteface': Modern Race Minstrels, Official Lynching, and the Culture of American Apartheid. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm
Join the Army, meet interesting people, kill them. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Is there online discussion by possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The ruling will have an effect on people trying to use takedowns to censor speech, and the court flags this as a problem. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:21 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
That begins in my opinion by having other people around you, and not just architects. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Measuring the Impact of High Court's 'Ledbetter' Ruling Special to Law.com Last month the Supreme Court ruled in Ledbetter v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:08 am
David Lat, editor of Above the Law, says the blog promises anonymity, which helps people act on their "human instinct" to "unburden themselves of a secret. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]