Search for: "People v. Stewart (1988)"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 477 n.9 (Cal. 1988); Stevens v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
§ 1988? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Stewart, 399 S.E.2d 344, 346-47 (N.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
App. 1993); People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
La. 1988), aff'd mem., 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Massachusetts: Lareau v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
Rev. 849 (1988-1989) (arguing for faint hearted originalism that did not overturn major precedents). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 56 (1988). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 853 F.2d 640, 641-42 (9th Cir. 1988); Young v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The core of the seditious conspiracy offense, as the Supreme Court held in the 1886 case Baldwin v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Oyama v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 57 (1988), rather than as false statements of fact. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 11:53 pm
September I discuss the case of Gill v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sharpe (2nd edition- originally published in 1988) 2008 Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law in Canada, 1900-1975 by Constance Backhouse Essays in the History of Canadian Law, Vol. [read post]
