Search for: "People v. Strickland"
Results 221 - 240
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Attinger, Adam v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that Michael Wearry’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
The Court confronted this directly in Hill v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:36 pm
In People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:05 am
For anyone familiar with Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm
Some people think that too many people are on vacation in August. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
If you’re wondering what the most-cited opinion in our system is, you may be bemused: With about 10,000 citations, it’s an opinion about ineffective assistance of legal counsel in death penalty cases, Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
We have further recognized that the purpose of providing assistance of counsel “is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial,” Strickland v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 Dutil v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]
