Search for: "People v. Strickland"
Results 101 - 120
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Rennard Strickland, "Indian Law and the Miner's Canary: The Signs of Poison Gas," 39 Clev. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
But meaningful representation does not require perfection as held in People v Ford and People v Anderson. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:58 am
However, other jurisdictions have found the rescue doctrine does allow a claim against someone who attempted suicide (for example Strickland v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm
MaineToday Media, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am
29 years ago, in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
It was held in Strickland v Washington and People v Linares that a defendant in a criminal proceeding is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
This was the ruling in the case of Strickland. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Attinger, Adam v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:23 pm
CARLA STRICKLAND v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 7:37 am
Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
If you’re wondering what the most-cited opinion in our system is, you may be bemused: With about 10,000 citations, it’s an opinion about ineffective assistance of legal counsel in death penalty cases, Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
They recognized that the test for what's considered ineffective assistance of counsel is not new (Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
See People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
We have further recognized that the purpose of providing assistance of counsel “is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial,” Strickland v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
See Jenkins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
I’ll start with Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:46 am
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
