Search for: "People v. Stuart (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2007, 4:44 am
[See IPBiz post Gettysburg and KSR v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (1859). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Rev. 731, 751-62, 773-93 (2013); People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'”… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Government has no affirmative duty to help protect people. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
HCJ) In Canadian case law, two Modern philosophers–specifically, two Utilitarians–John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, are overwhelmingly the most cited. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Not a single judge gave it a second thought in the 1970s, and marriage cases dried up during the early years of AIDS. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Bresler, 398 U.S. 6, 14 (1970); Hustler Magazine v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
The first involves the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, which was upheld in Stuart v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 NO.6942PropertyAmerican property : a history of how, why, and what we own / Stuart Banner.Banner, Stuart, 1963-Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press, 2011.KF562 .B36 2011PropertyReappraisals in the law of property / by John V. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
Stuart Pape, Shareholder, PolsinelliFirst Amendment never came up in the 1970s at the FDA—pre Virginia Pharmacy. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm
Sydney barrister Stuart Littlemore QC calculated that the average award for Singapore’s politicians is 12 times the Singaporean average. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Ct. 1970, 1979 (2021) (quoting Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
That was a battle fought out in the nineteenth century between John Stuart Mill and Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (Stephen J) and in the middle of the last century between Professor Herbert Hart and Sir Patrick Devlin (Devlin J). [read post]
