Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Levy)"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm
European Court of Human RightsNajafli v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
(See Complaint in ZCS, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Levy, Melissa A. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
This was the situation facing the defense lawyers in the case Armedi v. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 11:15 am
The Superior Court, Wake County, Jack W. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
BellSchenck v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court will hear arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Iin the case of Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells [2011] NSWCA 246 the Court of Appeal in New South Wales reversed the order of Levy DCJ that the trial of the action proceed without a jury. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
(LEONARD LEVY, ORIGINAL INTENT AND THE FRAMERS’ CONSTITUTION 214 (1988)). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
There is no evidence that anyone paid the taxes on the property after the 2009 tax year, although Harris County and related entities continued to levy taxes on it. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
After the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled 5-3 that a shooting spree in which the insured’s son fatally shot five people and wounding another involved six separate “occurrences, a nearly equally divided Supreme Court tilted the opposite way, ruling that the claims involved a single ‘occurrence. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
Decisions this Week Inter-American Court of Human RightsMoya Chacón v. [read post]
