Search for: "People v. Sweeney"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 12:35 am
Tessa recently highlighted the case of Masih v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
Sweeney, and J. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
Sweeney, and J. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
That said, of the 1,130 participants whose profiles Sweeney reviewed, only 579 had provided their full zip code, date of birth, and gender in the relevant fields. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
Last week, a group of MIT data scientists found a way to work back to 95 percent of the people in a European carrier’s data set from just four new location data points. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Universities are places where people make informed decisions after carefully studying the relevant factors and arguments involved in a thoughtful way. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:45 am
” Sweeney, of course, was another skirmish in the war on drugs, and so was State v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
Associated Newspapers Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rt Hon Lord Justice Leveson [2012] EWHC 57 – Read judgment On Friday 20 January 2012 the Administrative Court dismissed the second application for judicial review of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
Who can doubt that the Mail’s real motivation here is to deter people who fear the paper’s huge power to destroy reputations from telling Leveson what they know? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
(c) Sweeney J, Eady J, Mann J and Vos J? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
In the recent (unreported) case of Shackelford v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
And as someone who has spent my life in a union fighting for working people, I know that sometimes emotions bubble over. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:34 am
There is also a run down of ongoing legal action, such as the pending decision in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Sweeney & Cohn. supra, at p. 835 citing People v Edney, 39 NY2d 620 (1976); Cornell v Bernstein-Macaulay.Inc., 407 F.Supp. 420 (SDNY 1976); Heam v Rhay, 68 FRD 574 (ED Wash 1975); see also Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v Tri-Links Inv. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 1:09 pm
Original Article See Also State V. [read post]
