Search for: "People v. Thomas (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
  But because states cannot be defendants to claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the New York law has the effect (although not the purpose) of barring a certain subset of 1983 claims from the state courts. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareTuesday’s argument in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
And this is not, as Baude argues, "the same case as Maine v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by SHG
  With the Supreme Court's decision in Connick v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" In Section 1983 litigation, suing people acting under color of law means suing them in their individual capacities. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
"Has anyone informed Thomas that, according to the Innocence Project, there have been no less than 245 post conviction DNA exonerations in the United States, 17 of which were people sentenced to DEATH. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  Likewise, Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from Scalia's opinion in Arizona v. [read post]