Search for: "People v. Velasquez" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
I can't say it any better than Judge Reinhardt, who authors the opinion:"As an "attempt" in the state of California requires only "slight acts in furtherance of the [criminal] design," People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
The California Court of Appeal agreed with my opinion of class-action lawsuits in the recent decision, Starbucks v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Velasquez, 692 NE 2d 841 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1998 Rights that exist independently between a husband and wife are the same that would exist between any two people: the right to contract with each other, the right not to be harmed by the other, etc. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm by Giles Peaker
(v) Their needs in terms of locality to maintain employment and or family support. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
However, the ECtHR (Bevacqua and S v Bulgaria and Opuz v Turkey) and the CEDAW Committee (Yildirim v Austria; Goekce v Austria) have recognised that the right to privacy is also a positive obligation to secure the private realm so that individuals may flourish. [read post]